Interview: Stanley Kubrick Confesses To Faking The Moon Landings [UPDATED]

Stanley Kubrick admits on camera that he faked the moon landings for NASA
What did he just say?

The CAT rarely reposts, but in this case…  wow. 

This interview took place two days before Kubrick’s death. He must’ve known he was in trouble.

Stanley Kubrick Confesses To Faking The Moon Landings


A stunning new video has emerged 15 years after Stanley Kubrick’s death in which Kubrick admits that the NASA moon landings were faked. 

Filmmaker T. Patrick Murray interviewed Kubrick three days before his death in March 1999. He was forced to sign an 88-page NDA to keep the contents of the interview a secret for 15 years.

Below is a transcript from the interview with Stanley Kubrick, in which the 2001 Space Odyssey Director admits on camera that, “the moon landings ALL were faked , and that I was the person who filmed it.”

We have included a leaked rough cut of the interview below the transcript:


K: I’m so preoccupied. With my work, innovation, risk-taking, regrets…

T: Why are you giving this interview?

K: Because, it started to get to me after awhile. Well, this is difficult, because it is the first time I’ve talked about it. (sighs)

T: Sure, take all the time you need.

K: I’ve always been conflicted by it, but not consciously until years later. I was just blown away by the chance, the opportunity, the challenge of making this, this production, and I went into this like it was a regular film, like another regular film of mine, not thinking too much about uh the long term effects of what it would mean to society if it was ever discovered.

T: What are you talking about? I’m dying to know what you’re talking about.

K: Well, a confession of sorts. A movie I made, that nobody is aware of – even though they’ve seen it.

T: A movie you made, no one knows you made? Is that what you said?

K: That’s right. Is that intriguing? Do I have you intrigued?

K: I perpetrated a huge fraud on the American public, which I am now about to detail, involving the United States government and NASA, that the moon landings were faked, that the moon landings ALL were faked , and that I was the person who filmed it.

T: Ok. (laughs) What are you talking…You’re serious. Ok.

K: I’m serious. Dead serious.

K: Yes, it was fake.

T: Ok. Wait. Wait…

T: I don’t want this to be an R-rated film, but seriously, what the blank, but seriously…

T: I, I, I worked almost eight months to secure this once in a lifetime interview that almost no else could ever get, and instead of talking about his sixteen films that I’ve endured since I was a child…That we didn’t land on the moon, you’re saying?

K: No, we didn’t.

K: It was not real.

T: The moon landings were fake?

K: A, a, a.. fictional moon landing. A fantasy. It was not real.

K: Don’t you think it’s important for people to know the truth?

T: The moon landing in ’69, which was two years before my birth…

K: Is total fiction.

T: Total fiction.

T: Is that?…So, that’s the 15 year thing. So that’s makes sense now. That’s why I can’t release it for 15 years now, that makes total sense now.

T: Did we…we didn’t land on the moon you’re saying?

K: No, we didn’t.

T: Why are you telling me?

K: A, a, a, a massive fraud. An unparalleled fraud perpetrated against them. They SHOULD know.

K: Nixon want to uh, they were planning, yeah, he want to fake this, this moon landing…

T: Are you contending that people DON’T want to know the truth about the world, reality, the moon landings…?

K: The government, knowing this, takes advantage of it by perpetrating fraud after fraud after fraud.

T: How did you end up giving in? Being complicit with this fraud?

K: I didn’t want to do it.

T: This is NOT where I thought this interview was going!

K: With my help, with my, with my aid, and it is, it is bothering me.

T: I only have this certain amount of time with you. And I’ll talk about whatever you want, but…

T: You’re not…This isn’t some type of joke, or…

K: No. No, it’s not.

T: Or a film within a film thing…

K: Not joking. NOPE.

T: Okay.

K: The conspiracy theorists were right, on this occasion.

T: I don’t know what to ask you first.

K: I thought it was wrong, I just…I didn’t believe in perpetrating a fraud like that.

T: But you did.

K: It also undermined my artistic integrity to do that.

T: Ok, but you ended up saying yes. Why?

K: Well, yes, but because basically I was bribed. To put it bluntly, that’s what it was. It was just a plain fucking bribe.

T: Why are you telling me?

K:A, a, a, massive fraud. An unparalleled fraud perpetrated against them. They SHOULD know! Don’t you think it’s important for people to know the truth?

T: Why did they have to fake it? Why? Why would they ever need to do something like that? Why would the government ever want or need to do…

K: It’s no secret that NASA always wanted to fulfill this Kennedy prophecy.

T: Take it from the beginning…

T: I gotta be honest, this is where he (Kubrick) got me. I mean, when I actually put myself in his position, when I actually imagine that he was telling the truth, and that he was presented with this opportunity and if in the one in a billion chance that I lived his life and I was presented with the same opportunity, what would I do?

T: Yeah, he wanted his approval points up and he thought nothing could do it better than this.

T: What a conflict. I mean, gosh, I can’t imagine being presented with that opportunity. On one hand, I’d really would want to do it, but then I’d probably say I’m committing a crime, and lying…

T: It depends, but my guess would be…no, if you’re good, but you would do it.

K: Spielberg, (inaudible) Scorsese, even Woody Allen. There isn’t one of them who wouldn’t do this.

T: I gotta admit: I’d do it. I’d do it too.

T: But they dangled all this power and all this flattery on you, essentially?

K: Yeah, it got to me after awhile. You can listen to so much of that stuff before you start to believe it.

T: They just said you were the greatest and stuff?

K: Yeah, yeah – and I agreed with them.

K: Why are you telling the world? Why does the world need to know that the moon landings aren’t real and you faked them?

K: Which I consider to be my masterpiece.

T: And you can’t take credit, or even talk about…

K: Well, I am now..

T: Right, so you’ll be dead. In ten years, or 15…

K: Right, ten or 15 something like that.

T: So, you can’t talk to Roger Ebert about it. Does that frustrate you?

T: Why did they have to fake it? Why would they have to do that?

K: Because it is impossible to get there.

T: Ok, back up, back up, back up….

LINK to CLIP of Vimeo interview

[NOTE: The meat of the above interview starts at 16:50. We at The CAT sincerely hope that the finished film will be edited in such a way as to be not only unimpeachable, but have Kubrick’s words easily understandable. Right now, the video is hard to watch, and harder to glean real information from. Filmmaker: Just show the raw interview and stand back. We need the info, not the glitz.]

[NOTE2: Here’s has an excellent piece on the EYES WIDE SHUT reason why Kubrick was murdered — w/Kubrick’s death occurring two days after this interview was given, so perhaps there were TWO reasons. This filmmaker better grow eyes in the back of his head.]

Interview: Stanley Kubrick Confesses To Faking The Moon Landings
Kubrick just got revenge on his killers from beyond the grave. BOOM.

[OOPS. FYI, one of us tried to make a change in how comments displayed (embedded vs. full post) and this deleted ALL the comments. Sorry about that. We didn’t delete them!]

UPDATE: Scores of disinfonauts have descended onto this story, flooding the Net with altered videos and troll comments. None of this changes the facts, which were verified HERE by a team of people who are extremely talented in sleuthing out truth. It’s our job. And the truth is incontrovertible: we never landed on the moon. We already knew this. Kubrick just reified it. Nearly every single thing you’ve been taught in school and in the MSM is a lie, meant to keep your blinders in place and keep you buying 24/7. Break free.

13 thoughts on “Interview: Stanley Kubrick Confesses To Faking The Moon Landings [UPDATED]

  1. Hi Da-da,I just watched the “movie” of this interview and it completely smells like a fake setup. This seems disinformation done like that movie “Paul McCartney really is dead” where they supposedly had a confession tape by George Harrison narrating a 2 hour movie. The guy supposedly Kubrick in this film doesn't sound like him without that heavy Brooklyn accent, and the filming of him half in shadow reminds me of the Osama bin Laden films. Also,the multisecond clips of “Kubrick” talking interspersed with clips from his movies and the documentary production shots screams of fake blather, as does the film's introduction where this rich kid brags of all his father connections leading up to Donald Trump-the single most identifiable person depicted in the Eyes Wide Shut masks- as the type of person needed to land an interview with Kubrick, ridiculous. Also the scene where Kubrick says he's meeting with Nixon and smells his feet and Nixon compliments him on 2001 as a lead-in to asking him to fake the moon landings: It was released in April'68 and the first moon landing happened a year later, hardly a realistic time frame to accomplish this type of scam. It seems far more likely the two projects were interwoven with 2001 being a form of cultural conditioning tool they'd be happy to pay for to prepare the sheeple for the big show.


  2. Wow, thanks, Lisa! The edited video was unwatchable. On the actual interview you link for us, did you notice this warping, in and out of focus, of certain areas? Maybe it's the lighting.


  3. Okay, my feeling, although I would really really like to believe it is, without voice analysis, that it is a fake. I don't know that such software exists, but I feel a photo of Kubrick was superimposed over an actor. The interviewer vibration is jagged, egoistic and disrespectful. Also, as one clever commenter said at the 13:20 mark of the second one, the interviewer yells to “Kubrick” to respond as the CHARACTER.


  4. All I know is that eeeryone is saying A.) this doesn't look or sound like kubrick (brookly accent) and b.) that it is a promo for a movie coming out in january called “moonwalkers.” Again, I'm just sayin….


  5. So, you're all experts on what Kubrick sounded like?? Folks, THAT'S KUBRICK. Many of us have heard him LIVE. In Da-da's case, he's spoken with Kubrick. *We know for a fact that that is the man* saying the words you're all having a problem with. Hopefully, this (rather impaired-sounding) filmmaker will present the interview straight up so you can hear everything clearly. But even without that, The CAT is already 100% certain that that's Kubrick, and that what he's saying is the truth.You have been lied to for nearly two hundred years. This is just one (huge) inconvenient truth of thousands. Your world is not what you think.


  6. @anonymous – I am no expert at all on Kubrick. Just logically listening to the second video it seems that the interviewer is instructing the Kubrick guy. The face does seem to match photos. But it seems to fade in and out, so I thought maybe it was faked, but maybe it is just degraded film. Just discussing, have utmost respect for DaDa and the CAT team. :o)


  7. Sorry, did one of the CATs get huffy? I needed to change the litter, apparently. Da-da for one is thrilled to have Kubrick come forward from beyond the grave and tell the truth, but… I'm not so thrilled with the “filmmaker” or his approach. Seems like one of us could've approached Stanley and done a better job. Bygones. Anyway, it seems to me that this whole thing was intentionally edited to make it arbitrary. One CAT staffer said: “…when I watched the promo video, I got a bit of psyops off it, particularly when it mentions the documentary “Room 237” which seemed to me to be a clear effort to bury Weider's reading of the Shining in several competing, but wrong, readings. If I were going to guess, I would say the interview is legit, but that someone is releasing this in a way to get out in front of the story and make it look so goofy that no one pays attention.”If I were allowed to mix my metaphoric cliches, I'd say that this is the straight dope from the horse's mouth. If I weren't allowed, I'd probably say it anyway.


  8. This video is a rough-cut version of a hoax. At the 14 minute mark the interviewer refers to the interviewee as “Tom” and refers to “the script”. Kubrick Confession – Out Takes That Suggest It’s Fake Several times during the video you can hear the interviewer 'correcting' the interviewee and coaching him on what better to say. So, would an interviewer who was in awe of Kubrick be berating him for blowing his lines, correcting him and referring to him as 'Tom?' I do believe the supposed moon-landings were faked and that Kubrick may well indeed have been involved, but this video/transcript was also a hoax and you were burned just like many others (including me). But, apparently, “The CAT is already 100% certain that that's Kubrick, and that what he's saying is the truth” – despite any evidence to the contrary. I think the revelatory content of this post, for me, has more to do with those who claim that “Everything we post is 100% verified to be true.”


  9. PErhaps we should make this site private. The 3Ds can't take it. Just try to reveal the OTHER thing and watch as they castigate and flagellate. One vote for private.


Comments are closed.